Kassandra in Euripides’ Trojan Women:
The
Perversion of the Wedding Ritual
Rebecca M. Muich (University of Illinois)
It has been argued that the wedding ritual tends to be subverted in Greek
tragedy (Seaford, 1987). This paper will examine the not the subversion
but the perversion of the ritual in Euripides’ Trojan Women,
particularly in the case of Kassandra (lines 308- 461), chosen by Agamemnon
as his concubine. I will argue that Euripides perverts the marriage
ritual of the parthenos to
emphasize the suffering of the surviving women of Troy in the aftermath of
the war. By filtering the suffering of women through the lens of disrupted
ritual, Euripides powerfully reminds his audience that war affects every
stratum of society and that often the most intense suffering is not endured
by the dead, but by the living.
I will evaluate the representation of Kassandra’s marriage through three
different approaches. First I will argue that the marriage hymn Kassandra
sings is in structure and content similar to other marriage hymns found on
the Greek stage (Birds, Peace, Phaethon)
and lyric poetry (Sappho, Catullus 61 and 62) but is ironic and even uncomfortable
in the context of her status as future concubine to the conquering king. The
structure of the song and repeated references to herself and her bridegroom
as makarios suggests this was
meant to be the blessing hymn sung to the couple by their family and friends. Yet
the sight of Kassandra carrying her wedding torch, her invocations of Hekate
and Apollo, her insistence that her mother and the chorus dance and
rejoice, and repeated muttering by Talthybios that she has gone mad present
ironic visual and verbal cues to the audience and signal a pending doom for
Kassandra.
Secondly I will argue that the pathos of
her situation is amplified through frequent reminders that she is a young
virgin of marriageable age. The cry of euan, euoi,
the cry of the maenad, seems out of place in the marriage hymn, and has
often been explained away as a reference to her madness. However,
equating the parthenos with
the bacchant was not unprecedented (cf. Persephone in Homeric
Hymn to Demeter 386). It signified a dangerously wild quality
of the unmarried parthenos, a sentiment echoed in marriage hymns depicting marriage
as the taming of a wild animal (often represented by the verb damazo). It also signified the unbalanced nature of
some parthenoi, who suffered from the “wandering womb syndrome” described
by the Greek medical writer Hippocrates. The onset of puberty was
often accompanied by bouts of “hysteria” for which doctors prescribed sexual
intercourse and pregnancy as cures. Marriage is the final solution
for dangerous and unbalanced young women, of whom Kassandra is a prime
example.
Thirdly, I will argue that Kassandra’s characterization in Trojan Women is a conflation of two different perversions of the parthenos’ wedding: bride of death epitomized by Sophocles’ Antigone and the self-sacrificing virgin exemplified by Polyxena
(in Hecuba), Iphegenia (in Iphigenia
at Aulis), and Antigone. The
first representation, in which the woman’s death and entombment are re-imagined
as a marriage to Hades and a bridal chamber (Dowden, 1989; Rehm, 1994),
emphasizes that unnaturalness of a young woman dying before she was married – in
essence dying before she attained the honor of serving her polis completely. The
second representation (Lefkowitz, 1995) allows the virgin to choose death
as an alternative service to the state. Instead of marrying and producing
children, she sacrifices herself in order to save their city-states. Kassandra
embraces both roles: she views her marriage to Agamemnon as a death (but
also eerily relates her own actual death), and she rejoices in the opportunity
to avenge her family and the fallen Troy. But Euripides tinges her
triumph with irony as the audience remembers that Kassandra will not exact
the revenge she is plotting and she will not die a parthenos or
even a wedded-wife, but a war concubine.